http://forum.creativecommons.org/ CC Forum: Recent Posts en Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:16:12 +0000 http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/226#post-536 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:00:38 +0000 bdwrek 536@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>what version of Firefox are you using?</p> <p>I use FF and i dont get the problem you are having </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/228#post-534 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:04:55 +0000 globalciti 534@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Hi- I produce non-commercial short documentaries for the web. In the past, I have used creative commons photos and music to supplement my storytelling.</p> <p> One site I use for music is Jamendo. This year they began Jamendo Pro which you purchase a license for particular song you want to use for your video. </p> <p>This confuses me. The cost they ask for is miniscule but if the song is already released under the creative commons(attribute-share-alike-and noncommercial) license then why would I need to purchase an additional license from Jamendo? <a href="http://pro.jamendo.com" rel="nofollow">http://pro.jamendo.com</a></p> <p>Just to clarify the details of the video: It is for an organization. I am a professional and the videos are release under creative commons (share-alike, attribute, non-commercial, non-derivs).</p> <p>Thanks for your thoughts </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/212#post-533 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:14:37 +0000 bdwrek 533@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>No-one, ideas, anyone? </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/191#post-532 Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:56:52 +0000 Clifford.Cad 532@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I don't think it is allowed to distribute PDF or scanned books without permission of Author.</p> <p><a href="http://www.governmentsurplusauctionsonline.com/government_surplus_auctions/" rel="nofollow">http://www.governmentsurplusauctionsonline.com/government_surplus_auctions/</a> </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/145#post-531 Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:33:46 +0000 henrywilliamson 531@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I have always thought using the Google translator could work well.<br /> It even has a pluggin that will sit right below your mozilla firefox browser!</p> <p>Hope this helps.</p> <p>Henry<br /> <a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Colon-Cleansing-Formula---Flush-Out-That-Extra-25lbs-of-Poop-That-is-Slowing-You-Down-Every-Day-Now&amp;id=2892798">colon cleansing formula</a> </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/225#post-530 Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:53:48 +0000 sheilan 530@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Hi pgorham11,</p> <p>Do you include art from non US residents? As I live in Canada (BC) and would like to get exposure for more of my art? If so that would be great.</p> <p>Thanks</p> <p><a href="http://www.wartrolwarning.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.wartrolwarning.org</a> </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/227#post-529 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:03:29 +0000 adal2007 529@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>just a news about creative commons music.<br /> we have created the first compilation of creative commons music (involved artists such as Yoko Ono, Nine Inch Nails, Rivers Cuomo, Daniel Bautista and Many more great artists participate in this great cc compilation of 50 artists, and 57 cc licensed tracks.</p> <p>The project details on:<br /> <a href="http://creativecommonsmusic.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://creativecommonsmusic.wordpress.com</a></p> <p>thanks </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/171#post-528 Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:40:22 +0000 watch gossip girl online 528@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Well I agree with you guys. For me, there is no problem with using others' image to other promotions. Just make sure that you do not use it directly and it is only a support to one of your main images.</p> <p><a href="http://www.watchgossipgirlonline.tv/" rel="nofollow">http://www.watchgossipgirlonline.tv/</a> </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/172#post-527 Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:41:02 +0000 jolmes26 527@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>giving it freel may possibly do harm to us so i think we should be wise when it comes to using our disclaimers..</p> <p><strong><a href="http://www.mis-sold-payment-protection--insurance.co.uk/">Mis-Sold Payment Protection Insurance</a></strong> </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/226#post-526 Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:26:00 +0000 ritergal 526@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Hah! I found the answer. Use Chrome! But really, I should not have to switch browsers. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/226#post-525 Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:24:35 +0000 ritergal 525@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>For the first time today when I clicked open a Creative Commons search page in Firefox, I found a nasty little green tape offering to tell me how to select CC from my Firefox search. Rather ironically, I don't see this offer unless I'm on a Creative Commons search page. I wouldn't care, except it obscures the two Google CC search links. I cannot get rid of it. Has anyone figured out how to kill it? </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/225#post-524 Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:12:35 +0000 pgorham11 524@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Hello. Greenlifesavor is a new company that specializes in unique artwork and innovative products. Our goal is to show a variety of diverse pieces and distinctive creations from many communities across the US. We are also building a line of multicultural pieces. The philosophy of greenlifesavor is to appreciate all of our resources, including our human resources. If you would like to display your artwork or creations, please contact Pat at <a href="mailto:pgorham11@aim.com">pgorham11@aim.com</a>. Thank you. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/223#post-522 Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:19:55 +0000 james341 522@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>good day to you<br /> i have some question about the way the gizmodo.com site use the CCL<br /> in gizmodo site they say that : "Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution"<br /> i see that most of the articles they have in there site is took from other news site , they put the link in the end of the article for example like this [Robot Watch via Dvice] that means the article was publish in the site Robot Watch and they took it from Device.<br /> the ccl says that you are free to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work and to Remix — to adapt the work but You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). and You may not use this work for commercial purposes.<br /> so i don't understand because in gizmodo site they have a lot of commercials so is this o.k ?<br /> and can i do the same and open up a site in other language and take articles from gizmodo and publish them with my opinion and have commercials in it?<br /> thanks </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/172#post-521 Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:34:32 +0000 top10supplements 521@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I think we need to be more careful with our use of disclaimers, we shouldnt be too controlling, but then again we dont wanna give away everything freely. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/222#post-520 Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:25:05 +0000 dre 520@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Hi everyone,<br /> am interested in learning of stories, where someone was able to convince another party to become Creative Commons. as i myself would like to have someone's content, which is presently part of a public school system be made creative commons, similar in nature to opencourseware and in fact following the same or similar license.<br /> the content i'm hoping to convert is the work done by the Monkseaton school system teaching method in spaced learning</p> <p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaced_learning" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaced_learning</a></p> <p>so far ive contact MIT and the University of Oxford - Mathematics and asked them how they made the conversion and the benefits to them as i plan to write a letter to Headmaster, Paul Kelley requesting he make the data available in an opencourseware format.</p> <p>any ideas would be great! </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/221#post-519 Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:10:54 +0000 Stabs 519@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I hope you dont mind but i just have a few questions regarding all this copyright and licensing stuff..</p> <p>Now I am theoretically setting an online business at the moment, which i wish to turn into reality one day so Im doing all my research extra early.</p> <p>Myself and my partner want to begin an online business. The business is an online Digital Label for Techno-Drum and bass artists mainly. We want to sign artists who are not yet so well known but however have exceptional tunes.<br /> To sell the tracks we want to distribute them to a max of 2 major online digital stores such as juno and Itunes and we also want to sell the tracks through our own label website.<br /> We have contacted APRA (Australasias performance copyright association), and they sent us an agreement that we apparently sign which contains many many things that we CANNOT do with our artists music. The artists themselves lets us do more with their work than APRA lets us do with our artists own work!<br /> My question is: If i make a written agreement stating the rights of the artists and the label and in what way we can use their work and they agree in order to be under our label, do we really by law, need to sign up to these big collection societies?<br /> What can we do to avoid this?</p> <p>I was thinking in my contract I can present the idea of "creative commons" to the artists so we can have more freedom of their work and avoid these absurd things the collective society are asking us to do.<br /> All help is very greatly appreciated :)<br /> Thanks!</p> <p>Sofia Devetak </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/172#post-518 Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:43:15 +0000 hudlas 518@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Yes it is certainly ok to add a disclaimer as it gives you peace of mind in case you get some unscrupulous people.. I have used disclaimers on all my sites and software.</p> <p>Regards<br /> Brett David<br /> <a href="http://www.1weekdetoxdietplan.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.1weekdetoxdietplan.com</a> </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/220#post-517 Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:18:46 +0000 serenityfound 517@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>The organization I work for is putting its annual conference publication online. We are interested in offering CC licenses to the authors whose works appear in the publications, but I'm not sure which to use. It is an academic publication, so it would be best if the license allowed for the articles to be cited and otherwise used in other academic/journalistic situations (with attribution, of course). Which license would be best for this?</p> <p>Also, do we need to do a separate license for each author or can we simply license the publication? </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/191#post-516 Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:03:37 +0000 tonymatell 516@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I think if you do that most big authors wouldn't like somebody scanning their work. I am not sure but I think that's illegal.</p> <p>Tony Matell<br /> <a href="http://www.babyphon-babyphone.de" rel="nofollow">http://www.babyphon-babyphone.de</a> </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/219#post-515 Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:06:10 +0000 nokapixel 515@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Hello. I apologize if this has already come up on this forum, but I can't seem to find it anywhere. I have been contacted by a business that wants to purchase the rights to my CC-protected photo, which I have posted on flickr. The business that contacted me wants me to supply them w/ rights paperwork that simply states that I am giving them permission to use my photo in exchange for $xxx. Does CC or any other site have a resource where I can find this kind of paperwork? </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/179#post-514 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 04:58:44 +0000 ChristianStevens2 514@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>It can vary depending if the posted has the commercial liscense for the picture. There are services such as stock photos that you can have these rights, then you should be okay.</p> <p>I hope this helps.</p> <p>Christian.<br /> <a href="http://www.colodetoxxrinfo.com/">colodetox xr</a> </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/218#post-513 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:12:02 +0000 nino36 513@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>i am in an artist collective. as part of our work we designed a warehouse which we intended to use for art events. like concerts, exhibitions, performances. in a way the whole place is our sculpture/installation.<br /> then the conditions of having the place became completely inacceptable. we had to leave. now the owner wants to buy everything for very little money and do the art events himself using our image.<br /> is there a way to protect our work at least in the way that it can not be used for commercial events or to force them to always show the names of the artist each time a part of the installation is shown on a photo or such? </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/214#post-512 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:38:54 +0000 ndewan456123 512@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>hi all<br /> even i also agree with you that yahoo cc search engine is really not a good one even i also dont like it as i was trying to search a software but it keep on showing me other irrelevant things.it nearly waisted me 30 mins to locate a simple thing...i am sorry to say yahoo need to improve it </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/217#post-506 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:19:21 +0000 marjoleink 506@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p><strong><em>Embedding CCzero in image files - version 2.</em></strong></p> <p><strong>Approach</strong></p> <p>0. <em>Variables:</em></p> <p> %name% name of creator (or, in this context, "publisher")<br /> %uri% URI where creator can be contacted: a profile/contact web page or an email address<br /> %title% title of the work - if any (IPTC "headline"is not the same??)<br /> %country% "territory" where image is published, as applicable jurisdiction (if specified)</p> <p>1. <em>Creator</em></p> <p> Someone has to place a work into the public domain. The CCzero tool uses terminology "publisher"; I'm assuming publisher here is equivalent with with creator (copyright holder).<br /> =&gt; This is / can be defined in [EXIF] Artist, [IPTC] By-line or [XMP] dc:creator</p> <p>2. <em>URI</em></p> <p> %uri% is intended to be "[t]he URL where people can find more information about the work or the person using CC0."<br /> =&gt; In practice, this could be a URI: for instance either an email address, or a contact web page, as stored in [XMP] CreatorContactInfo; another option is the URL of a creator's profile page (which then preferably contains a way to contact the creator). A URL would be preferable to an email address, since a page (or contact form) can take changes in (email) address into account.</p> <p>3. <em>Country</em></p> <p> What counts is "publication" (?), in practice this wil be the country where creator resides.<br /> =&gt; In practice (going on this assumption) this can be embedded in [XMP] CreatorContactInfo in the Country and CountryCode fields</p> <p>5. <em>Title</em></p> <p> Going by IPTC Core guidelines this might be the file name of (original) scan or digital camera file.<br /> Given that 1) such a name might not be unique (even for the photographer) and 2) we're not referring to a work, but embedding IN a work, the title loses some relevance. But, the actual *file* placed in Public Domain may not be the same as the original camera file.<br /> =&gt; A possible option is to embed the file name of the actual file to be placed in the public domain in that file (especially if it is NOT the original camera file). Two possible locations are [IPTC] Title and [IPTC] Keywords (as one of the keywords). The last is especially<br /> useful when images are uploaded to webservices that create their own filenames / URIs for the<br /> images: if a creator needs to be contacted, the original file name can be referenced, rather<br /> than an arbitrary URI where the image may have been found.</p> <p>5. <em>Copyright statement</em></p> <p> For embedding, this can not contain any (HTML) markup; link to creator's contact %url% can be replaced by creator's %name%; reference to %title% is redundant, especially if we already embed this (as applicable file name) elsewhere in the file.<br /> Based on the sample HTML, the "Public Domain" copyright statement to be *embedded* then becomes:<br /> "To the extent possible under law, %name% has waived all copyright and related or neighboring<br /> rights to this work"<br /> =&gt; assign this to variable %copyright%</p> <p>6. <em>License URL</em></p> <p> For CCzero this is always the same, regardless of whether a "territory" for jurisdiction has been defined:<br /> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/" rel="nofollow">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/</a><br /> =&gt; assign this to variable %licurl%</p> <p><strong>Define values for replaceable variables</strong></p> <p>[%name%]</p> <ul> <li>Creator's name</li> </ul> <p>[%uri%]</p> <ul> <li>URL for Creator - e.g., a profile page: should contain a way to contact Creator; or</li> <li>Contact URL for Creator - should contain contact form, email and/or postal address; or</li> <li>email address for Creator (actually a URI)</li> </ul> <p>[%title%]</p> <ul> <li>filename of actual image to be placed in the Public Domain (not necessarily original camera/ scanner file)</li> </ul> <p>[%country%]</p> <ul> <li>country name where creator resides; or </li> <li>(if different) country where image is published and placed in Public Domain</li> </ul> <p>[%copyright%]</p> <ul> <li>the derived copyright statement as defined in Approach</li> </ul> <p>[%licurl%]</p> <ul> <li>the Creative Commons CCzero license url</li> </ul> <p><strong>Implementation</strong></p> <p>By image metadata standard (use ALL of these to keep maximum interoperability and consistency):</p> <p>[EXIF]</p> <ul> <li>fill Artist with %name%</li> <li>fill Copyright with %copyright%</li> </ul> <p>[IPTC IIM]<br /> NOTE: There are length restrictions for all fields</p> <ul> <li>add "CC0 1.0" (or later version if/when that appears) to Keywords</li> <li>add %title% to Keywords<br /> maximum length for each keyword is 64 characters</li> <li>fill By-line with %name%<br /> maximum length is 32 characters - but see CopyrightNotice!</li> <li>fill CopyrightNotice with %copyright%<br /> maximum length is 128 characters, which leaves only 20 for %name%! (shorten name or truncate?)</li> <li>fill Contact with %uri%<br /> maximum length is 128 characters; for a URL a (reliable) URL-shortening service might be used if the full URL is too long</li> </ul> <p>[XMP]<br /> No length restictions like IPTC IIM has.</p> <ul> <li>fill Title with %title%</li> <li>fill (a) dc:creator with %name%</li> <li>fill dc:rights['x-default'] with %copyright% *)</li> <li>fill (a) dc:subject with "CC0 1.0" (or later version if/when that appears)</li> <li>fill (a) dc:subject with %title%</li> <li>fill a number of Iptc4xmpCore:CreatorContactInfo fields, at least: <ul> <li>Iptc4xmpCore:CountryCode with country code matching %country%</li> <li>Iptc4xmpCore:CiAdrCtry with %country%</li> <li>Iptc4xmpCore:CiUrlWork with %uri% IF it actually is a URL (preferable), or<br /> Iptc4xmpCore:CiEmailWork with %uri% IF it is an email address</li> </ul> </li> <li>fill xmpRights:Marked with "False"</li> <li>fill xmpRights:UsageTerms with %copyright%</li> <li>fill cc:license with %licurl%</li> </ul> <p>*) If/when CreativeCommons provides localized versions, these can be embedded in additional dc:rights elements</p> <p>---------</p> <p><strong>Outstanding problem:</strong><br /> I see no way to *explicitly* tying a "territory" to the "Public Domain" notice like the "This work is published from" phrase does in the generated HTML; adding this to the copyright statement may be possible, but then this would be truncated in the IPTC CopyrightNotice anyway.</p> <p>As before: comments and suggestions very welcome! </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/217#post-505 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:56:41 +0000 marjoleink 505@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I have now read (and mostly absorbed) the MWG Guidelines document (as well as parts of IPTC and XMP documents). That was fun. :)</p> <p>I was happy to find that much of my own reasoning and intent as encoded in my scripts matched that of the MWG, but there were fields and issues I was unaware of - I'll have to tweak a lot of my scripts to stay as close as possible to these guidelines. At least I won't have to start all over again.</p> <p>Anyway, as a result, I've come up with a (much more detailed) version of how I intend to <strong>embed</strong>, as clearly as possible, and taking MWG guidelines into account, <strong>CCzero</strong> "Public Domain" information in image files (specifically, <strong>photos</strong>: I have placed files in the public domain before in formats that do not support embeddable metadata).</p> <p>It's long, so I'll put it into a separate post in this thread. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/217#post-503 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:20:23 +0000 marjoleink 503@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Turbinator,</p> <p>This topic is specifically about embedding CCzero (= Public Domain) info in images, so I really do want to set xmpRights:Marked to "False". :) I'm setting it to True for All Rights Reserved and the <em>other</em> CC licenses. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/217#post-502 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:53:01 +0000 Turbinator 502@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>marjoleink,<br /> I guess, you want to set xmpRights:Marked to 'True'.<br /> The page <a href="http://wiki.creativecommons.org/XMP" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.creativecommons.org/XMP</a> says:</p> <blockquote><p> xmpRights:Marked - False if Public Domain, True otherwise. </p></blockquote> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/217#post-501 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:24:02 +0000 marjoleink 501@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Phil,</p> <p>Thanks for the fast reaction and for that reference - I've downloaded their PDF and am reading it now.</p> <p>I wasn't aware of a Copyright field in Exif and had been assuming that <strong>adding</strong> data to Exif should be avoided (I've been limiting myself to the timestamps, at most adding one where it was "missing"). Adding Copyright seems a useful exception (and I like that that matches with my approach to get the same data in multiple available locations to make it more easily accessible across applications).</p> <p>I'll review my "strategy" outlined above once I've absorbed the MWG document. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/217#post-500 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:03:57 +0000 Phil Harvey 500@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>The MWG recommendation is to write EXIF:Copyright, IPTC:CopyrightNotice and XMP-dc:Rights. I suggest that you write all three of these with the copyright notice.</p> <p>See <a href="http://www.metadataworkinggroup.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.metadataworkinggroup.org/</a> for details. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/178#post-498 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:09:03 +0000 Oxygen Sensor 498@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>the increase in fees is ridiculous! This fitness music genre is ripe for entrepreneurs. I wonder if there is a fitness/gym version of Muzak - the ubiquitous elevator music remade for gyms. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/217#post-497 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:35:30 +0000 marjoleink 497@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I'm working on a set of scripts to help me embed meta data (including licensing metadata) in my photographs, with ExifTool doing the actual editing, and my scripts taking care of prompting for (and validating) all necessary information, navigating directories, logging, etc.</p> <p>While I would mostly use this for either "All Rights reserved" or "CC Share Alike", I'm writing it so that any available license may be used - I might use this on photos I get from others, or even do it *for* others. And "any available license would include CCzero.</p> <p>While this isn't easy in general, this site gives some good guidance on how to embed a CC license (even though I'm not using Adobe products). For Public Domain (CCzero) this is much less clear.</p> <p>Interpreting what is available, I've come up with a strategy and would like some feedback on this. The tool to generate a bit of HTML asks a number of variables; I've used symbols to see what it generates: %title%, %name%, %url%, and tried with and without choosing a "territory". But you cannot embed HTML in a photo, so here's what I've come up with:</p> <p>Note: I'm using both IPTC and XMP data, for two reasons: there is overlap but they are largely complementary, and not all applications (fully) support XMP yet, so it's important to embed as much as possible in corresponding fields in the IPTC info.</p> <p>[IPTC]</p> <ul> <li>fill [IPTC] By-line with %name%</li> <li>fill [IPTC] Contact with %url% (i.e., URL or email where creator can be contacted for information)</li> <li>fill [IPTC] Copyright with "Public Domain"</li> <li>add "CC0 1.0" to the [IPTC] keywords</li> </ul> <p>[XMP]</p> <ul> <li>fill [XMP dc] Creator with [IPTC] By-line (if any) - or vice versa: %name%</li> <li>fill [XMP dc] Title with [IPTC] Headline (if any) - or vice versa: %title% (if any!)</li> <li>(optional) supplement [IPTC] creator info with further [XMP] CreatorContactInfo; especially country (CiAdrCtry) if you define a jurisdiction "Territory"</li> <li>fill [XMP Rights] Marked with "False"</li> <li>fill [XMP Rights] UsageTerms and [XMP dc] Rights with text based on "To the extent...", replacing name link with Creator name and title<br /> with "this work", e.g. th following text:<br /> "To the extent possible under law, %name% has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this work."</li> <li>fill [XMP cc] license with the (rel=license) URL: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/" rel="nofollow">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/</a></li> </ul> <p>ExifTool partly uses other field names in its interface, because it can tag a large number of electronic formats, not just images, and there are homonyms - it actually writes to the correct fields.</p> <p>I hope this is clear. Comments and suggestions welcome. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/214#post-495 Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:49:06 +0000 bdwrek 495@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Im not pleased with yahoo's CC search engine now. Everytime i try to search anything on it I get redirected to the uk yahoo search instead and it throws up normal search results as the UK version of yahoo doesnt have CC search.</p> <p>Not happy </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/215#post-492 Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:08:23 +0000 Manove 492@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Normally, one can use the doctrine of Fair Use to include excerpts of copyrighted works in one's own works. However, can you no longer do this if your own work is licensed under a Creative Commons license. </p> <p>For example, this post is licensed under a CC-BY license. Suppose I found a really clever copyrighted haiku about CC licenses and I wanted to include it here to discuss it. I wouldn't have any trouble including the haiku on a non CC website because I'd be protected by the Fair Use doctrine:<br /> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use</a></p> <p>However, if I pasted it in to this forum post, I'd be giving everyone in the world permission to reproduce the haiku. People would no longer need to credit the original author or ask his/her permission. All that they would need to do is include a link to this post, because I would have essentially released the haiku under a CC-BY license.</p> <p>Does this mean that we can't use any fair-use excerpts in larger works that are licensed under a CC license? Does the license somehow allow for this? </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/179#post-489 Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:36:30 +0000 ac compressor 489@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I have been watching this thread for a few days hoping for some answer Need to use some pictures myself. The owner of the photo never responded. Is it safe to use? </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/194#post-488 Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:07:10 +0000 williamharty 488@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>That would be good, maybe bands such as Radio head would be into that.<br /> But seriously, that is a great topic to look into. We'll do some investigation on this and see what comes up.</p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>William</p> <p><a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Acai-Fit-Warning---What-They-Do-Not-Say-About-the-Acai-Berry-Fad-That-Has-Captured-1000s-of-People&amp;id=2975650">acai fit</a> </p>