http://forum.creativecommons.org/ CC Forum Tag: copyright - Recent Posts en Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:53:50 +0000 http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/182#post-554 Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:44:29 +0000 rgraham 554@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Just to clarify, does this mean that you are relasing the lyrics and score under CC, but in doing so don't want anybody to use the lyrics and score to make studio recordings, OR you are releasing the lyrics and score under CC, and it's your own studio recordings that you want to retain full copyright on? </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/182#post-541 Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:13:55 +0000 osorio 541@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>RE 'some commercial rights reserved'</p> <p>CC wiki link:</p> <p><a href="http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_does_the_Creative_Commons_.E2.80.9CSome_Rights_Reserved.E2.80.9D_button_mean.3F_What_does_a_Creative_Commons_license_do.3F" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_does_the_Creative_Commons_.E2.80.9CSome_Rights_Reserved.E2.80.9D_button_mean.3F_What_does_a_Creative_Commons_license_do.3F</a> </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/178#post-498 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:09:03 +0000 Oxygen Sensor 498@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>the increase in fees is ridiculous! This fitness music genre is ripe for entrepreneurs. I wonder if there is a fitness/gym version of Muzak - the ubiquitous elevator music remade for gyms. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/182#post-476 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:30:57 +0000 diner dash game 476@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Is there even a 'some commercial rights reserved'? I'm not really aware of it. I do know that there's an Attribution Non-Commercial, Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike and Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/178#post-466 Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:38:23 +0000 Anonymous 466@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>This is an opportunity I thought for Creative Commons artists to approach Fitness program providers, such as Les Mills and offer their work. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/182#post-455 Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:19:11 +0000 Ladies clothing 455@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I have the same question. To my knowledge, commercial rights reserved mean permission is granted to reproduce any or all of this page for individual or non-profit institutional internal use as long as credit is given. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/178#post-434 Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:33:55 +0000 Early Learning Toys 434@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>It will be interesting to see how this pans out, because I can see the majority of smaller gyms not even changing the music they play.</p> <p>How the PPCA plans on enforcing it will be interesting indeed... </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/182#post-411 Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:13:36 +0000 Insurance Leads 411@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Can you give me details about the 'some commercial rights reserved' attribute? I don't fully understand. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/178#post-384 Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:53:06 +0000 Jacket 384@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>This is an opportunity I thought for Creative Commons artists to approach Fitness program providers, such as Les Mills and offer their work.<br /> The Les Mills latest CD offering had only 50% PPCA controlled works - if that becomes 100% then Creative Commons licenced music may have a new market.</p> <p> I agree that the increase in fees is off the scale, and the fitness industry would be better off approaching Artists directly! Creative Commons is being promoted by the PPCA putting its fees up!</p> <p>Jack </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/182#post-363 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:00:25 +0000 osorio 363@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I think you may need to utilize the 'some commercial rights reserved' attribute in your license agreement. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/178#post-357 Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:50:12 +0000 Yagan Kiely 357@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Or they will merely use copyright free music, or live music.</p> <p>The increase in fees is laughable, especially when virtually none of the money ends up in the Artist's hands. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/182#post-351 Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:13:54 +0000 gomi 351@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I would like to license the lyrics and score of my music under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0, Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 for audio of live performances, and retain full copyright on studio recordings.</p> <p>What is the best way to do this, keeping in mind that I don't want to leave any room for confusion. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/178#post-346 Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:24:39 +0000 Jacket 346@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Hi all,<br /> interesting issue in the Australian fitness industry - local music rights controller Phonographic Performance Company of Australia (PPCA) are wanting to increase the fees they charge the industry.</p> <p>If however the industry or even a particular gym simply chose instead to use appropriately CC licenced music, possibly even opting to pay some fees direct to the artists they have downloaded could provide them an out.<br /> The proposal will see an increase in fees from the industry go from $1.5 million a year to $100 million a year!</p> <p><a href="http://www.taxonfitness.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.taxonfitness.org</a></p> <p>I immediately thought of Creative Commons artists...</p> <p>Jack@! </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/134#post-270 Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:10:28 +0000 altuzar 270@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Hi. Maybe a lot of commentaries are "responsability of their authors" and sometimes the Legal Section of the site states that the "Content posted by users are dedicated to the public domain" (that's from Digg).</p> <p>But a lot of times, there's nothing else than the (c) in the footer and that's all. </p> <p>So, what's the copyright status of that "content posted by users" in blogs? Is an answer about that? </p>