<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CC Forum Topic: 2 licenses?</title>
<link>http://forum.creativecommons.org/</link>
<description>CC Forum Topic: 2 licenses?</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:22:15 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>jegenes on "2 licenses?"</title>
<link>http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/170#post-335</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jegenes</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">335@http://forum.creativecommons.org/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Not sure how to explain this, but here goes:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I've just released a new CD (my own label), and am a BMI member as my PRO. The album is registered with ISRC codes, etc, through BMI. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm creating a Remix site, where people will be able to download the songs in their raw formats (ie: individual tracks for each song: think, &#34;Nine Inch Nails&#34;). I have remixed the master recordings especially for this. Each song will contain 6-10 tracks (instruments, vocals, etc) for the user to remix. (For those who don't know, these individual tracks are called &#34;Stems&#34;) &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I want to offer the stems under a CC license (BY-NC-SA), but still want my original release (and the songwriting) to be under the commercial BMI license. I see the remix stems as being different property than the album itself. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What problems, if any, do you see in this scenario? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;--john
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
