http://forum.creativecommons.org/ CC Forum Topic: Attribution Share-Alike (v2.5) in closed web app? en Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:45:05 +0000 http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/173#post-467 Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:53:47 +0000 Anonymous 467@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Take the advice of others and try to contact the application creator if possible. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/173#post-435 Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:42:06 +0000 Early Learning Toys 435@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>This is kind of a tough one. Take the advice of others and try to contact the application creator if possible. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/173#post-415 Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:12:01 +0000 janmanzer411 415@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>A permission from a share holder won't be that strong. I would suggest you try to get contact or wait until you can get in touch to the original artist before anything else.</p> <p>Best Regards,<br /> Jan Manzer<br /> <a href="http://www.janmanzer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.janmanzer.com</a> </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/173#post-409 Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:45:33 +0000 Artificial Turf Grass 409@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I'm having problems contacting the original artist. Would permission from a direct relative who's a share holder be sufficient? </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/173#post-385 Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:10:38 +0000 Poker Odds Calculator 385@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I agree with the Jacket. the artist hold the true power so it is important that you get a yes to prevent any lawsuit. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/173#post-347 Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:23:07 +0000 Jacket 347@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Yes you do say this all the time - however it needs to be re-stated. The artist now has the power. The CC licence empowers the artist, and because you can directly contact the artist, you are encouraged to do so! </p> <p>No lawyer can get in the way. If the artists says yes - score! it also provides them with a much needed commodity - feedback!</p> <p>Just my opinion...<br /> Jack </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/173#post-343 Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:20:35 +0000 sympodius 343@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>Kind of a tricky one. The CC licenses aren't really intended for source code. I feel like I say this all the time, but when in doubt: ask the original creator. It's their work at the end of the day. So, if they don't mind, they can waive any aspect of the license for you. </p> http://forum.creativecommons.org/topic/173#post-338 Wed, 27 May 2009 15:02:35 +0000 isak 338@http://forum.creativecommons.org/ <p>I'd like to use a CC-SA -licensed widget (code + graphics) in a closed source web application.</p> <p>It looks to me like this is allowed, as long as we don't distribute said application (under a non-share-alike-compatible license). Am I right?</p> <p>A potential sticking point here is what the CC means by 'distribution'. Would only selling/giving away the source count, or is merely putting it up on our web server enough?</p> <p>Thank you,<br /> Isak </p>